Employment Discrimination

“While I was eating breakfast with my son at Big Boy on Washtenaw, I noticed a young black man come into the restaurant and politely inquire as to whether they were hiring. He was told, rudely, that they weren’t. Curious, when I paid my bill, I asked if they were hiring. I was, very politely, told they were, and asked to wait, while he went into the back to retrieve an application.” 

 

Facebook Post

Sarah Robichaud, a white woman from Michigan, posted this classic example of employment discrimination on Facebook. Then she asked others to share her post, which included #butracismisover, #boycottbigboy, and #bigboyonwashtenaw. Well, you can clearly see where she is going with this one.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from discriminating against applicants based on race, sex, color, religion or national origin. Sure, employers can reject walk-ins or unsolicited applicants. However, in situations like this one, one should have been more cognizant of the fact that no one truly ever knows who is watching or even listening nowadays.

Absolutely “anyone” has the capability to “go live” or post instances of discrimination, which could be harmful to not only the employer, but also the applicant(s) and employee(s) considering the fact that vital info may be missing. Since its employee was clueless, you guessed it; the Big Boy is now subject to unlawful discrimination claims.

Classic

To this end, employers must comply with federal, state and local nondiscrimination laws and should not use discriminatory criteria in the application process. Though we are not certain how Sarah’s call to action will turnout, obviously, employees at Big Boy need unlawful discrimination compliance training. To keep it “one hundred” with you, she just gave them a textbook example of what not to do to help shape its new training!

 

 

3 thoughts on “Employment Discrimination

  1. I hope there is a follow-up blog that explains how Sarah completely misread the situation, causing complete mayhem for an innocent company for simply no good reason. Sarah even made another post explaining how she was wrong and how she should have made sure she had her facts straight. She was quick to take to social media and she respectfully admitted fault like a decent human being. Too many people are stuck on the first story and completely disregard the real story. I can’t wrap my head around the fact that those who are outraged by a terrible situation, straight up refuse to accept that the situation was in fact all a misunderstanding! Isn’t that a win? A relief? Sure doesn’t seem like it, considering the many individuals who have made the decision to disregard the truth for the sole purpose of holding on to hate. To me, THAT is the problem… those who manifest non-existing problems to blow out of proportion solely because they get off on unnecessarily protesting ‘hate’, are walking contradictions that will inevitably tear us all down eventually.

    Like

Let's talk...

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.